Vendor comparison · facts checked July 20, 2026
Eva vs EntityMed for AI aesthetic visualization
A scope-first comparison for practices evaluating public website capture and provider consultation workflows. Pricing is dated and qualified because the public offers are not like-for-like.
Bottom line
Evaluate the full workflow, disclosure, usage allowance, and contract term—not a decontextualized monthly number.
Like-for-like checklist
What is public, what Eva provides, and what to verify
| Decision point | Eva | EntityMed / buyer verification |
|---|---|---|
| Public price context | $499 per location for each of the first two founding-pilot cycles. Each cycle includes 200 successful previews; renewal requires an explicit agreement. | The official homepage says packages start at $499. A separate body-simulator page advertises $199/month for a limited period. Confirm the exact product, term, usage, onboarding, and renewal price. |
| Public website capture | No-account hosted preview, treatment selection, required photo permission, bounded generation, lead capture, and consultation request. | Ask for a live end-to-end demonstration from anonymous website visit through staff follow-up and deletion. |
| Provider workflow | Eva preserves both a public capture path and a provider-side planner/presentation path. The public flow currently has stronger output validation and retention controls; planner parity remains an open gap. | Ask who can review, regenerate, present, export, and delete an image, and how permissions differ by location and staff role. |
| Simulation boundary | Visible language describes images as illustrative simulations, not diagnosis, candidacy, treatment advice, clinical prediction, or guaranteed outcomes. | Verify this boundary on every generated image, share/export surface, and provider presentation—not only in terms of service. |
| Identity and quality | Treatment definitions bound target zones, intensity language, and features intended to remain unchanged. Quality must still be judged with representative portraits and failure cases. | Run the same evaluation set. Check identity preservation, asymmetry, texture, teeth/eye/hair drift, and behavior on an unusable photo. |
| Privacy and retention | The public flow requires one versioned photo-and-consultation permission, excludes model training, separates promotional consent, supports deletion, and defines a maximum retention boundary. | Request the current photo-processing notice, subprocessors, storage regions, default retention, deletion SLA, training policy, and breach-response terms. |
Comparison method: Eva facts reflect the product and public terms in this repository. Competitor price facts come only from EntityMed’s public pages checked on July 20, 2026; rows labeled “ask” are evaluation questions, not assertions about EntityMed.
Best-fit lens
Choose around the job you need to prove
Choose Eva to test website capture
Eva is a direct fit when the immediate job is a branded, privacy-bounded public preview that carries context into a consultation request.
Evaluate EntityMed for its complete suite
EntityMed may fit a different or broader scope. Ask the vendor to map the exact modules, treatments, body/face workflows, and package included in its current offer.
Pilot with an evaluation set
Whichever vendor you consider, use the same consent review, representative portraits, failure cases, consultation workflow, and outcome definitions.
Questions
Avoid a false apples-to-apples comparison
Do Eva and EntityMed both cost $499?
The published amounts need context. Eva's $499 price is per location for each of the first two founding-pilot monthly cycles and includes 200 successful previews per cycle, with continued-service terms requiring a new agreement. EntityMed's public site says packages start at $499, while a separate body-simulator promotion advertises $199 per month for a limited period. Confirm scope, usage, term, onboarding, and renewal terms before comparing the offers.
Which product is a better fit for website lead capture?
Eva is designed around a no-account public preview, required photo-and-consultation permission, first-party funnel events, tenant-scoped lead routing, and a consultation handoff. Buyers should ask EntityMed to demonstrate its current public-capture path and data flow rather than infer it from a pricing page.
Does either simulator predict a clinical result?
Eva explicitly treats every generated image as an illustrative simulation rather than medical advice, candidacy assessment, or a guaranteed outcome. Ask every vendor to show exactly where equivalent disclosure appears during capture, result review, export, and consultation.
What should a practice verify in a live demo?
Use the same source portraits and treatments, then assess identity preservation, unrelated-feature drift, failure handling, consent, retention and deletion, staff review, branding, routing, included usage, and the complete price term.